|
Post by Tony Ravenscroft on Aug 12, 2018 12:16:20 GMT -6
Currently, Austin Guitars is a house trademark of St. Louis Music, a.k.a. SLM. For about 20 years, Austin has been the name of SLM's entry-level "house brand" line, a notch or two below their Alvarez line, and until 2009 or so were made in Korea to high specs; those have the "AU" prefix, though later versions (still quite good) have been seen tagged China or Indonesia. Some of the basses of that era are clearly rebranded Alvarez instruments, which officially discontinued all their solid-body basses in like 2002; those Austins seem to resell for half the price of an identical Alvarez, even though they were made on the same line. Austin's AU-series steel-string acoustics generally sport a highly distinctive bridgeplate: A graphic designer/photographer named John Niebling (HipSnap Creative, St. Louis) put together the 2005 Austin catalogue, and has the entire PDF viewable on his Portfolio page. For a researcher like me, this has been invaluable. (If you are an AU fan, I STRONGLY recommend that you archive a copy for yourself -- web sites do disappear from time to time, and the Archive.org Wayback Machine often doesn't keep the image content of low-traffic sites. ) The subsequent three-letter electrics are just straight-up clones of Tele, Strat, and SG, and many six-string acoustics. While by all reports quite good for the price, I have not been hands-on with any of them... and, really, they don't have any fun in their story!! The "Austin" name had been previously used elsewhere for import knockoffs, and are not at all related to SLM. Here is a bolt-neck LP from Japan (and NOT Matsumoku) --
|
|
|
Post by Tony Ravenscroft on Aug 12, 2018 13:18:19 GMT -6
Because it'll get asked soon enough: some thoughts about value.
As I'll repeat regularly, the editor of The Blue Book of Guitar Values, Zach Fjestad, stated a rule of thumb that I've since named Fjestad's Law. My version:
That last is "manufacturer's suggested retail price." Not many people in recent years have EVER paid "full retail" for an instrument, exceptions being those who bought a gift for their kid/grandkid from some local mom-and-pop music store, who in all likelihood threw in a few lessons, lifetime free adjustments, discounted strings, and other value-added extras... which are mostly part of a dim and fading past.
Many guitars, especially those aimed specifically at large chains and mall-based shops, went from the distributor to the seller at roughly 40% of MSRP. (I'll get into the gory details in a different thread.)
In the Austin instance, things are... messy. Though there are some AU variants on The Usual Suspects (almost always the Fenderoid clones) that are highly prized, most Austins you see are nothing special, with "mystery wood" bodies, and almost all Strads from the Era Standard group (see other thread) are nothing more than good inexpensive guitars, and a few million of them scattered around. If you want a decent-enough axe for backup or practice or a rowdy club, these AUs are a bargain, certainly superior (IMO) to Squier Affinity, & by keeping an eye open you might stumble across one of the better versions. With original price $200-$220, you can probably find one for MUCH less than half that.
But as you move upward in value, recent real-world prices creep faster. You may never see an AU998 jazzbox for sale, and certainly for AT LEAST the $699 "retail" tag; the thru-neck Eclipse Pro basses are almost as rare, and about 80% MSRP. I'm a fan of the AU-792, a very good PRS 22 clone that regularly gets $200-$250 (retail $449).
Trev Wilkinson seems to have had some active role in design of the AU series, and most of the early $399+ electrics had not only an alder body but some combo of Wilkinson pickups, bridge, and tuners, maybe all. Many sellers, though, are unaware of the details, and it's not unusual to see a used 931 ($419) priced like a 731 ($199) at maybe $75.
IN SUM (and subject to change) -- An "AU" Austin that's not a bottom-tier clone AND is in good shape AND is priced less than 40% of MSRP is worth serious considering. This includes basses and acoustics, and likely banjos and mandolins as well.
|
|
|
Post by Rex on Apr 26, 2020 21:41:57 GMT -6
Good stuff, Tony (as always). Some corrections and additions, though, because why pass up an opportunity to be anal? The unpublished catalog from Hipsnap Creative is a 2006 version, not 2005. The 2005 catalog was most definitely published — I have a hard copy of it. The early 2000s saw a rising diversity in the number of models offered. This culminated in the transition from 2005 to 2006. The 2006 catalogue has a notable increase in the number of models offered, and in the level of detailed workmanship in some of the models. The information in the catalogs is consistent with the real-world examples I’ve seen and what I’ve figured out about the serial numbers. 2006 also saw a change to the headstocks of Fender-type models. Austin’s “AU” block logo era ran from the early 2000s to the late 2000s. The earliest models I’ve seen have 2003 serial numbers. The latest dates to 2008. Austin went through a phased transition between about 2009 and about 2011. Serial numbers changed, so I’m less certain of the dates. The block logo was retained through about 2010, though the model numbers changed (no longer AUnnn), as did some of the finish details. Sometime around 2011, the transition to script logo happened, and the diversity of models was severely cut back. There were also some changes to body shapes that, to my eyes, might have taken them a little farther away from copyright issues. i have no idea what the script-logo guitars are like. I’ve never played one.
|
|